Christ is King! by David B Smith
“When the Son of Man comes in his glory and all the angels are with him, he will sit on his glorious throne. All the nations will be assembled in front of him, and he will separate them from each other as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.”
And welcome to the last Sunday of the Christian Year.
Yes, next Sunday we’ll all be wishing a ‘Happy Advent’ to one another as the ecclesiastical calendar kicks in for a fresh term but this Sunday is the last Sunday of the old year – a Sunday traditionally celebrated as the feast of “Christ the King”, and so it seems appropriate that we have as our Gospel reading today a passage that depicts Christ as king, and doing what kings do – passing judgement on his subjects!
I say that this is ‘traditionally’ the feast of ‘Christ the King’ as if this has been the case since time immemorial, but in fact it is a tradition that goes back less than 100 – to Pope Pius IX.
Pius proclaimed this feast day in 1925, during that volatile period between the two World Wars – where we were all still counting the cost of the Great War, but where Adolf Hitler was coming to power in Germany and threatening to plunge planet earth back into global violence. Yet, at that stage, everything still hung in the balance. War may not have been inevitable, but the forces that would determine the future of world history didn’t seem to have any immediate connection to the teachings of the church, and so it was at that point that Pius say fit to proclaim that it was Christ who would ultimately judge the world, regardless of what the world’s political powers might do.
The parallels of that period with our own time seem almost uncanny to me!
I was watching a video this week that Father Elias urged me to look at. It was one I’d seen some time ago – an interview with former American General Wesley Clark where he talks about a confidential government plan he became aware of back in 2001 – a plan to take out seven countries in five years! And I won’t bother listing all seven countries for you, but suffice it to say that with Libya now gone only Syria and Iran are left on the list!
And the prospect of war with Iran looms as something that could thrust our world into a period of darkness such as we have not seen in human history up to this point. And whether this happens or not, we appear to be in the grip of forces over which we have no control. And so it seems appropriate once again to proclaim that it is Christ’s judgement on our world that is going to be the one that is ultimately going to count!
“When the Son of Man comes in his glory and all the angels are with him, he will sit on his glorious throne. All the nations will be assembled in front of him, and he will separate them from each other as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.”
I notice something very startling right away about Christ’s judgement of the world – namely that it’s not made on a national basis!
And I mean this in two senses:
Firstly, I mean that Christ is not doing what we do. He’s not damning all Iranians to hell!
Have you ever noticed how before we go to war with a country we have to go through a process of dehumanising their inhabitants?
It seems that as human beings we are not good at killing people we think of as family men and women like ourselves, so we give them names – call them spiks or spooks or gooks or geeks or something similar. And along with the name-calling comes a sense of distance and suspicion as we come to think of these people as being agents of an axis of evil.
It wasn’t that long ago that you’d meet someone and say, “and where abouts to you come from, brother?” and he’d say “Afghanistan” and you’d say, “Yeah, what’s the weather like over there?”
Now as soon as you hear the word “Afghanistan” you take one step back and say “Oh” and you find yourself putting your hands in your pockets, just keeping one hand on your wallet. Can these people really be trusted?
As I say, when we see Christ pass judgement here in Matthew 25 it is not on a national or political or ethnic basis. It is not on the basis of colour. It is not a judgement between sheep and horses – between white-coloured and brown-coloured creatures – but between characters who, at a distance, all appear pretty much the same.
And this is different from what we do as we pass judgement on entire peoples and nations, and, even more significantly (from a Biblical point of view) it is different from what Jesus’ hearers would have done, for these were people who saw God’s judgement of the world as something that would take place totally along ethnic lines!
As far as Jesus’ hearers are concerned, and as far as the whole Bible is concerned up to this point, it is the people of Israel who are the people of God, and so the judgement that the people of God are waiting for is one that will judge in favour of Israel over the rest of the world!
From a Biblical point of view this depiction of the judgement of the world, where all the nations seems to be being judged on an equal footing, is simply astounding – so much so that many scholars suggest that we probably would do best to interpret this image of judgement as being a judgement of the non-Jewish nations only!
We all know that it is the people of Israel who are the people of God in the Bible, and so it would just be too outrageous for Jesus to depict the judgment of the world in such a way that Jews and non-Jews were all being judged on an equal basis!
And so such scholars would suggest that when the passage begins by saying that “all the nations” are assembled before Christ, it means “all the non-Jewish nations” only – the understanding being that there is a secondary process of judgement for the people of Israel (a process that for some reason doesn’t end up getting a mention)!
And personally I think that is a crazy way to read the text, and yet I am sympathetic with those who wish to avoid the obvious meaning of the passage because it is so radical! For what we are looking at here in Matthew 25 is a depiction of Christ’s judgement of the world, where not only does ethnicity and nationhood seem to be irrelevant to the process, but religion seems to be irrelevant too!
This is too much, isn’t it? I mean â
